Best Nilah Synergies

The best partner with Nilah is Yuumi Support. The pair wins 53.1% across 2,635 games, 1.5 points more than the two champions' own win rates predict. Syndra Mid (+0.8 over 1,253 games) and Viktor Mid (+0.6 over 1,105 games) also over-perform. Malzahar Mid has the highest raw win rate (56.3%) among well-sampled pairs, but that is about what its own strength predicts (54.5% expected). Based on Low Elo Ranked Solo/Duo games, patches 26.20-26.22. These are observed associations, not guaranteed outcomes. The weakest listed synergies for Nilah are Yasuo Mid, Yone Mid, Master Yi Jungle, Viego Jungle, Zed Mid, Warwick Jungle, Thresh Support, Graves Jungle, Briar Jungle, and Teemo Top. The detailed info below lists each partner with observed win rate, expected win rate delta, sample size, rank scope, and patch window.

Updated 2026-11-15. Data is current for LoL patch 26.22 (all regions, low elo and high elo).

Top 10 Low Elo Nilah strongest synergies

  1. Yuumi Support - 53.1% win rate with Nilah ADC (+1.5 points vs expected), 2,635 games.
  2. Syndra Mid - 52.1% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.8 points vs expected), 1,253 games.
  3. Viktor Mid - 54.0% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.6 points vs expected), 1,105 games.
  4. Veigar Mid - 54.0% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.6 points vs expected), 1,212 games.
  5. Lux Support - 54.1% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.5 points vs expected), 1,650 games.
  6. Malzahar Mid - 56.3% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.5 points vs expected), 1,373 games.
  7. Fizz Mid - 55.5% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.4 points vs expected), 1,112 games.
  8. Seraphine Support - 55.1% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.4 points vs expected), 1,637 games.
  9. Lee Sin Jungle - 50.2% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.4 points vs expected), 1,627 games.
  10. Morgana Support - 55.0% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.3 points vs expected), 1,173 games.

Top 10 Low Elo Nilah weakest synergies

  1. Yasuo Mid - 50.9% win rate with Nilah ADC (-1.4 points vs expected), 2,043 games.
  2. Yone Mid - 51.8% win rate with Nilah ADC (-1.1 points vs expected), 1,721 games.
  3. Master Yi Jungle - 53.3% win rate with Nilah ADC (-1.0 points vs expected), 1,706 games.
  4. Viego Jungle - 51.2% win rate with Nilah ADC (-0.9 points vs expected), 1,551 games.
  5. Zed Mid - 51.2% win rate with Nilah ADC (-0.7 points vs expected), 1,347 games.
  6. Warwick Jungle - 53.9% win rate with Nilah ADC (-0.6 points vs expected), 1,162 games.
  7. Thresh Support - 51.9% win rate with Nilah ADC (-0.6 points vs expected), 1,883 games.
  8. Graves Jungle - 52.0% win rate with Nilah ADC (-0.5 points vs expected), 1,058 games.
  9. Briar Jungle - 51.6% win rate with Nilah ADC (-0.5 points vs expected), 1,050 games.
  10. Teemo Top - 51.0% win rate with Nilah ADC (-0.5 points vs expected), 1,360 games.

Top 5 High Elo Nilah strongest synergies

  1. Nautilus Support - 53.2% win rate with Nilah ADC (+1.4 points vs expected), 1,204 games.
  2. Thresh Support - 55.0% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.8 points vs expected), 1,650 games.
  3. Syndra Mid - 49.4% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.2 points vs expected), 1,040 games.
  4. Ahri Mid - 54.5% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.2 points vs expected), 1,211 games.
  5. Qiyana Jungle - 48.5% win rate with Nilah ADC (+0.1 points vs expected), 1,030 games.

Top 6 High Elo Nilah weakest synergies

  1. Soraka Support - 49.3% win rate with Nilah ADC (-1.8 points vs expected), 1,528 games.
  2. Nami Support - 49.0% win rate with Nilah ADC (-1.2 points vs expected), 1,001 games.
  3. Yasuo Mid - 51.4% win rate with Nilah ADC (-0.5 points vs expected), 1,036 games.
  4. Yuumi Support - 48.6% win rate with Nilah ADC (-0.5 points vs expected), 2,357 games.
  5. Lulu Support - 52.2% win rate with Nilah ADC (-0.1 points vs expected), 1,145 games.
  6. Lee Sin Jungle - 50.0% win rate with Nilah ADC (-0.0 points vs expected), 1,516 games.

How these matchup statistics are calculated

Counter and synergy statistics use Ranked Solo/Duo games, exclude matches shorter than 600 seconds, and group results by patch window, region, rank scope, and champion role.

Pairwise pages use a rolling three-patch window and compare observed win rate with a log-odds expected win rate based on each champion's role-adjusted baseline; listed pairs require at least 1,000 games.

Read the full methodology for the model and guidance on interpreting these results.