Best Sion Mid Counters

Low Elo data lists Yone Mid, Syndra Mid, Ahri Mid, Viktor Mid, and Yasuo Mid as the strongest counters for Sion Mid. Sion Mid is listed as favorable into Malzahar Mid, Akali Mid, and Zed Mid. The detailed info below lists each matchup with observed win rate, expected win rate delta, sample size, rank scope, and patch window.

Updated 2026-11-15. Data is current for LoL patch 26.22 (all regions, low elo and high elo).

Top 5 Low Elo Sion Mid same-role counters

  1. Yone Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Yone Mid, 40.3% observed win rate, -8.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,273 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  2. Syndra Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Syndra Mid, 46.9% observed win rate, -2.7 percentage points vs expected, 1,006 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  3. Ahri Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Ahri Mid, 47.9% observed win rate, -2.7 percentage points vs expected, 1,560 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  4. Viktor Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Viktor Mid, 49.7% observed win rate, -0.5 percentage points vs expected, 1,092 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  5. Yasuo Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Yasuo Mid, 50.5% observed win rate, -0.1 percentage points vs expected, 1,332 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.

Top 3 Low Elo champions Sion Mid is good against

  1. Malzahar Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Malzahar Mid, 57.3% observed win rate, +7.2 percentage points vs expected, 2,521 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  2. Akali Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Akali Mid, 55.0% observed win rate, +1.8 percentage points vs expected, 1,438 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  3. Zed Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Zed Mid, 53.7% observed win rate, +0.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,538 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.

Top 10 Low Elo Sion Mid all-role counters

  1. Yone Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Yone Mid, 40.3% observed win rate, -8.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,273 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  2. Syndra Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Syndra Mid, 46.9% observed win rate, -2.7 percentage points vs expected, 1,006 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  3. Ahri Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Ahri Mid, 47.9% observed win rate, -2.7 percentage points vs expected, 1,560 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  4. Lillia Jungle - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Lillia Jungle, 43.4% observed win rate, -1.5 percentage points vs expected, 1,160 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  5. Lucian ADC - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Lucian ADC, 48.6% observed win rate, -0.9 percentage points vs expected, 1,041 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  6. Viktor Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Viktor Mid, 49.7% observed win rate, -0.5 percentage points vs expected, 1,092 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  7. Ashe ADC - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Ashe ADC, 49.0% observed win rate, -0.4 percentage points vs expected, 1,385 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  8. Mordekaiser Top - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Mordekaiser Top, 47.2% observed win rate, -0.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,487 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  9. Darius Top - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Darius Top, 51.3% observed win rate, -0.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,490 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  10. Aatrox Top - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Aatrox Top, 50.8% observed win rate, -0.2 percentage points vs expected, 1,436 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.

Top 10 Low Elo all-role champions Sion Mid is good against

  1. Malzahar Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Malzahar Mid, 57.3% observed win rate, +7.2 percentage points vs expected, 2,521 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  2. Akali Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Akali Mid, 55.0% observed win rate, +1.8 percentage points vs expected, 1,438 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  3. Jinx ADC - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Jinx ADC, 52.5% observed win rate, +0.7 percentage points vs expected, 2,035 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  4. Jhin ADC - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Jhin ADC, 53.1% observed win rate, +0.7 percentage points vs expected, 3,026 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  5. Lux Support - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Lux Support, 53.7% observed win rate, +0.5 percentage points vs expected, 1,577 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  6. Thresh Support - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Thresh Support, 52.1% observed win rate, +0.3 percentage points vs expected, 2,001 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  7. Miss Fortune ADC - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Miss Fortune ADC, 50.6% observed win rate, +0.3 percentage points vs expected, 2,044 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  8. Cho'Gath Jungle - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Cho'Gath Jungle, 50.7% observed win rate, +0.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,267 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  9. Zed Mid - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Zed Mid, 53.7% observed win rate, +0.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,538 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  10. Nautilus Support - Low Elo data: Sion Mid vs Nautilus Support, 52.8% observed win rate, +0.2 percentage points vs expected, 2,074 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.

Top 1 High Elo Sion Mid all-role counters

  1. Kai'Sa ADC - High Elo data: Sion Mid vs Kai'Sa ADC, 49.0% observed win rate, -1.2 percentage points vs expected, 1,603 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.

Top 2 High Elo all-role champions Sion Mid is good against

  1. Jhin ADC - High Elo data: Sion Mid vs Jhin ADC, 50.9% observed win rate, +0.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,381 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  2. Thresh Support - High Elo data: Sion Mid vs Thresh Support, 51.1% observed win rate, +0.2 percentage points vs expected, 1,047 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.

How these matchup statistics are calculated

Counter and synergy statistics use Ranked Solo/Duo games, exclude matches shorter than 600 seconds, and group results by patch window, region, rank scope, and champion role.

Pairwise pages use a rolling three-patch window and compare observed win rate with a log-odds expected win rate based on each champion's role-adjusted baseline; listed pairs require at least 1,000 games.

Read the full methodology for the model and guidance on interpreting these results.