Best Veigar Support Counters

Low Elo data lists Blitzcrank Support and Lux Support as the strongest counters for Veigar Support. Veigar Support is listed as favorable into Seraphine Support, Leona Support, Thresh Support, Nautilus Support, Morgana Support, and Lulu Support. The detailed info below lists each matchup with observed win rate, expected win rate delta, sample size, rank scope, and patch window.

Updated 2026-11-15. Data is current for LoL patch 26.22 (all regions, low elo and high elo).

Veigar Support matchup tips

  1. Veigar vs Thresh Support - Stand behind minions to deny Death Sentence(Q) a clear hook; a Veigar support matchup guide specifically recommends using minions to block it.

Top 2 Low Elo Veigar Support same-role counters

  1. Blitzcrank Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Blitzcrank Support, 43.3% observed win rate, -0.8 percentage points vs expected, 1,083 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  2. Lux Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Lux Support, 46.4% observed win rate, -0.3 percentage points vs expected, 2,210 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.

Top 6 Low Elo champions Veigar Support is good against

  1. Seraphine Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Seraphine Support, 48.6% observed win rate, +1.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,523 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  2. Leona Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Leona Support, 46.8% observed win rate, +1.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,416 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  3. Thresh Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Thresh Support, 48.1% observed win rate, +1.2 percentage points vs expected, 1,761 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  4. Nautilus Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Nautilus Support, 48.4% observed win rate, +0.4 percentage points vs expected, 1,608 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  5. Morgana Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Morgana Support, 47.2% observed win rate, +0.4 percentage points vs expected, 1,273 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  6. Lulu Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Lulu Support, 49.1% observed win rate, +0.2 percentage points vs expected, 1,130 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.

Top 10 Low Elo Veigar Support all-role counters

  1. Teemo Top - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Teemo Top, 40.9% observed win rate, -1.1 percentage points vs expected, 1,054 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  2. Kai'Sa ADC - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Kai'Sa ADC, 45.3% observed win rate, -1.0 percentage points vs expected, 2,658 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  3. Blitzcrank Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Blitzcrank Support, 43.3% observed win rate, -0.8 percentage points vs expected, 1,083 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  4. Garen Top - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Garen Top, 42.7% observed win rate, -0.6 percentage points vs expected, 1,190 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  5. Ezreal ADC - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Ezreal ADC, 49.1% observed win rate, -0.5 percentage points vs expected, 1,764 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  6. Yone Top - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Yone Top, 45.9% observed win rate, -0.5 percentage points vs expected, 1,246 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  7. Jhin ADC - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Jhin ADC, 46.1% observed win rate, -0.5 percentage points vs expected, 2,813 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  8. Akali Mid - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Akali Mid, 46.3% observed win rate, -0.4 percentage points vs expected, 1,027 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  9. Lux Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Lux Support, 46.4% observed win rate, -0.3 percentage points vs expected, 2,210 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  10. Master Yi Jungle - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Master Yi Jungle, 45.2% observed win rate, -0.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,457 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.

Top 10 Low Elo all-role champions Veigar Support is good against

  1. Seraphine Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Seraphine Support, 48.6% observed win rate, +1.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,523 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  2. Leona Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Leona Support, 46.8% observed win rate, +1.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,416 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  3. Thresh Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Thresh Support, 48.1% observed win rate, +1.2 percentage points vs expected, 1,761 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  4. Mordekaiser Top - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Mordekaiser Top, 45.7% observed win rate, +0.7 percentage points vs expected, 1,306 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  5. Jinx ADC - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Jinx ADC, 46.7% observed win rate, +0.6 percentage points vs expected, 2,180 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  6. Tristana ADC - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Tristana ADC, 49.3% observed win rate, +0.4 percentage points vs expected, 1,354 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  7. Nautilus Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Nautilus Support, 48.4% observed win rate, +0.4 percentage points vs expected, 1,608 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  8. Morgana Support - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Morgana Support, 47.2% observed win rate, +0.4 percentage points vs expected, 1,273 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  9. Yunara ADC - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Yunara ADC, 48.6% observed win rate, +0.4 percentage points vs expected, 1,219 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.
  10. Malphite Top - Low Elo data: Veigar Support vs Malphite Top, 47.5% observed win rate, +0.3 percentage points vs expected, 1,089 games, 3-patch window 26.20-26.22.

How these matchup statistics are calculated

Counter and synergy statistics use Ranked Solo/Duo games, exclude matches shorter than 600 seconds, and group results by patch window, region, rank scope, and champion role.

Pairwise pages use a rolling three-patch window and compare observed win rate with a log-odds expected win rate based on each champion's role-adjusted baseline; listed pairs require at least 1,000 games.

Read the full methodology for the model and guidance on interpreting these results.